Past Year QuestionsJIPMATVARCPhrases

JIPMAT Phrases — PYPs

3 solved Phrases previous year questions (PYQs) from JIPMAT past year papers — attempt each and check the answer.

Free SolutionsNo Login3 Questions
Q1:jipmat 2025VARCPhrasesMediumVARC · MCQ
Pick the odd one out from the following options:
  • Astrip of
  • Bstrip off
  • Cstrip away
  • Dstrip against
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We need to identify which of these phrasal verbs is an imposter. Three of them are legit English idioms, and one is just straight cap. Step 1: Analyze 'strip of'. This means to take away a title or property (e.g., 'He was stripped of his medals'). Legit. Step 2: Analyze 'strip off'. This means to remove clothing or a covering (e.g., 'Strip off the old paint'). Legit. Step 3: Analyze 'strip away'. This means to gradually remove layers to reveal what's underneath (e.g., 'Strip away the lies'). Legit. Step 4: Analyze 'strip against'. This isn't a thing. You can lean against something, or push against it, but 'strip against' makes zero sense in the English language. It's the odd one out. Final Answer: strip against
Q2:jipmat 2025VARCPhrasesMediumVARC · MCQ
Below are given alternatives to the underlined part of the sentence which may improve the sentence. Choose the correct alternative: 'Some forms of feminisms have been criticised for take into account only white, middle class and college educated perspectives.'
  • Ato take in
  • Bfor taking into
  • Cto take into
  • Dby take into
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: The sentence has a massive grammatical fumble right after the word 'criticised'. We need to fix the preposition and the verb form that follows it. Step 1: Identify the rule. When you criticize someone, the standard structure is 'criticized for [doing something]'. The preposition 'for' demands a gerund (an '-ing' verb) right after it. Step 2: Apply the rule to the sentence. The base verb is 'take'. Converting it to a gerund gives us 'taking'. Step 3: Reconstruct the phrase. We keep the preposition 'for', use the gerund 'taking', and keep 'into' to maintain the phrase 'taking into account'. Step 4: Check the options. Option B ('for taking into') perfectly aligns with standard English grammar rules. Final Answer: for taking into
Q3:jipmat 2025VARCPhrasesEasyVARC · MCQ
In the question, the sentence has two blanks: each blank indicating that something has been omitted. Choose the set of words for the blanks which best fits the meaning of the sentence as a whole. 'The _______ of new projects in the energy sector is _______ not only on low cost or profitability of the project but also on sustainability'.
  • Aplanning, vulnerable
  • Boccurrence, premised
  • Cinitiation, dependent
  • Dstarting, possible
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We need a double-word combo that flows naturally and makes logical sense regarding business projects. Step 1: Analyze the sentence structure. We need a noun for the first blank ('The [noun] of new projects') and an adjective/participle for the second blank that connects smoothly to the preposition 'on' ('[word] not only on'). Step 2: Test Option A: 'The planning... is vulnerable not only on...'. 'Vulnerable on' is grammatically weird and doesn't make sense contextually. Step 3: Test Option B: 'The occurrence... is premised not only on...'. 'Occurrence of new projects' sounds unnatural (projects are launched, they don't just 'occur' like weather). Step 4: Test Option D: 'The starting... is possible not only on...'. 'Possible on' is a grammatical fail. Step 5: Test Option C: 'The initiation... is dependent not only on...'. 'Initiation' (the act of beginning) fits perfectly. 'Dependent on' is a flawless, standard English collocation. This combo passes the vibe check with flying colors. Final Answer: initiation, dependent

Browse other topics · JIPMAT