Past Year QuestionsIPMAT Indore2026MCQ

IPMAT Indore 2026MCQ

All 30 MCQ previous year questions (PYQs) from the IPMAT Indore 2026 past year paper, with answers and full solutions.

Free SolutionsNo Login30 Questions
Q1:ipmat indore 2026QATime & WorkEasyMCQ · MCQ
Painter A can paint a building in 12 days while Painter B can paint it in 16 days. If A and B work on alternate days, and A starts the work on the first day, then the number of days required to paint the building is
  • A132313 \frac{2}{3}
  • B131213 \frac{1}{2}
  • C133413 \frac{3}{4}
  • D7677 \frac{6}{7}
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a classic Time & Work alternate-day scenario. We need to establish a "total work" baseline by finding a common multiple of their completion times. Then, we calculate their combined output for a 2-day cycle and simulate the final days to get the exact fractional time. Math, logic, and syntax have been double-verified. Step 1: Set the Total Work and Rates. Let's assume the total work-done to be a multiple of 12 and 16, such as 192 units (for simple calculation). * Painter A's rate = 16 units/day. * Painter B's rate = 12 units/day. Step 2: Calculate the 2-Day Cycle Output. Since they work on alternate days with A starting first, a single 2-day cycle yields: 16+12=28 units16 + 12 = 28\ units Step 3: Fast-forward the cycles. We divide the total work (192) by the cycle output (28) to see how many full cycles fit. In 12 days, there are exactly 6 such pairs. Work completed in 12 days = 6×28=1686 \times 28 = 168 units. Work left over = 192168=24192 - 168 = 24 units. Step 4: Play out the remaining days. * Day 13: It is A's turn to work, and A completes 16 units of work. Work left after 13 days = 2416=824 - 16 = 8 units. * Day 14: It is B's turn to clear the remaining 8 units. B does 12 units in 1 day, so the time taken by B to complete 8 units is: 812=23 day\frac{8}{12} = \frac{2}{3}\ day Step 5: Calculate final time. Adding the total days together gives us the final time required: 13+23=1323 days13 + \frac{2}{3} = 13 \frac{2}{3}\ days Final Answer: 132313 \frac{2}{3}
Q2:ipmat indore 2026QAProgression & SeriesHardMCQ · MCQ
Gita starts from point A and walks 1000 m east. She then walks 800 m north, followed by 640 m west and 512 m south, reaching point B. After this, she continues moving in the same cyclic order: east, north, west, south, with each successive movement 20% shorter than the previous one. After infinitely many such moves, approximately how far in meters will Gita be from her starting point A?
  • A711
  • B800
  • C765
  • D781
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We are dealing with an infinite geometric progression (GP) mapped onto a 2D coordinate plane. Gita is doing a spiral walk where each step is nerfed by 20% (an 0.8×0.8\times multiplier) compared to the previous one. To solve this, we need to calculate her total net displacement along the X-axis (East/West) and Y-axis (North/South) using the sum of an infinite GP formula, and then use the Pythagorean theorem to find the absolute straight-line distance from her spawn point (A). Math, logic, and syntax double-verified. Step 1: Calibrate the GP multiplier. Each movement is 20% shorter, meaning the multiplier (common ratio) between consecutive steps is 10.20=0.81 - 0.20 = 0.8. A full directional cycle consists of 4 moves (East, North, West, South). The common ratio between the *same* direction across cycles (e.g., East 1 to East 2) is: r=(0.8)4=0.4096r = (0.8)^4 = 0.4096 The formula for the sum of an infinite GP is S=a1rS = \frac{a}{1 - r}. Our common denominator for all axes will be: 10.4096=0.59041 - 0.4096 = 0.5904 Step 2: Calculate the net X-Axis displacement (East - West). Let's group her East and West movements to find the net horizontal distance per cycle. * First East = 10001000 * First West = 640640 * Net East for Cycle 1 = 1000640=3601000 - 640 = 360 Now, we plug this into our infinite GP sum formula: Net East=3600.5904Net\ East = \frac{360}{0.5904} Step 3: Calculate the net Y-Axis displacement (North - South). Let's group her North and South movements for the net vertical distance. * First North = 800800 * First South = 512512 * Net North for Cycle 1 = 800512=288800 - 512 = 288 Apply the infinite GP sum formula: Net North=2880.5904Net\ North = \frac{288}{0.5904} Step 4: Execute the Pythagorean drop. We now have her absolute horizontal and vertical coordinates. We use d=x2+y2d = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} to find the hypotenuse (the straight-line distance from A). d=(3600.5904)2+(2880.5904)2d = \sqrt{\left(\frac{360}{0.5904}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{288}{0.5904}\right)^2} d=3602+28820.5904d = \frac{\sqrt{360^2 + 288^2}}{0.5904} Let's calculate the square root payload: 3602+2882=129600+82944=212544360^2 + 288^2 = 129600 + 82944 = 212544 212544461.02\sqrt{212544} \approx 461.02 Step 5: Secure the final stat. Divide by our GP denominator to get the final distance: d461.020.5904780.86d \approx \frac{461.02}{0.5904} \approx 780.86 Rounding this to the nearest integer gives us 781781. Final Answer: 781
Q3:ipmat indore 2026QAPermutation & CombinationMediumMCQ · MCQ
The number of ways in which coins of denominations of rupees 2, 5 and, 10 can be combined to make a value of rupees 50 is ___
  • A10
  • B21
  • C20
  • D19
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We are tackling a Linear Diophantine equation problem disguised as a coin combination puzzle. Since we have three variables (a,b,ca, b, c) and only one equation (2a+5b+10c=502a + 5b + 10c = 50), we can't brute-force a single algebraic solution. Instead, we anchor the heaviest coin (cc) to create bounded timelines, and use parity (even/odd logic) to filter the remaining valid coin combos. Math, logic, and syntax are locked and double-verified. Step 1: Set up the core equation. Let a,b,ca, b, c represent the quantities of Rs 2, Rs 5, and Rs 10 coins respectively. The total value is capped at 50 rupees. 2a+5b+10c=502a + 5b + 10c = 50 Step 2: Isolate and establish parity. Anchor the Rs 10 coins (cc) to the right side to simplify the battlefield. 2a+5b=5010c2a + 5b = 50 - 10c Notice the right side (5010c50 - 10c) is always an even number. Since 2a2a is inherently even, 5b5b is forced to be even as well to keep the equation balanced. For 5b5b to result in an even number, the quantity bb must be an even integer (b{0,2,4,}b \in \{0, 2, 4, \dots\}). **Step 3: Iterate through the cc timelines.** We test all possible quantities for the Rs 10 coin (the max cc can be is 55, since 10×5=5010 \times 5 = 50) and count the valid even values for bb. Once bb is locked, aa automatically scales to fill the remainder, meaning we only need to count the valid bb values to get the number of ways. * **If c=0c = 0:** 2a+5b=50    5b502a + 5b = 50 \implies 5b \leq 50. Valid even b{0,2,4,6,8,10}b \in \{0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10\} \rightarrow 6 ways * **If c=1c = 1:** 2a+5b=40    5b402a + 5b = 40 \implies 5b \leq 40. Valid even b{0,2,4,6,8}b \in \{0, 2, 4, 6, 8\} \rightarrow 5 ways * **If c=2c = 2:** 2a+5b=30    5b302a + 5b = 30 \implies 5b \leq 30. Valid even b{0,2,4,6}b \in \{0, 2, 4, 6\} \rightarrow 4 ways * **If c=3c = 3:** 2a+5b=20    5b202a + 5b = 20 \implies 5b \leq 20. Valid even b{0,2,4}b \in \{0, 2, 4\} \rightarrow 3 ways * **If c=4c = 4:** 2a+5b=10    5b102a + 5b = 10 \implies 5b \leq 10. Valid even b{0,2}b \in \{0, 2\} \rightarrow 2 ways * **If c=5c = 5:** 2a+5b=0    5b02a + 5b = 0 \implies 5b \leq 0. Valid even b{0}b \in \{0\} \rightarrow 1 way Step 4: Tally the total combinations. Sum the number of valid ways from all six timelines to get the final score. Total=6+5+4+3+2+1=21Total = 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 = 21 Final Answer: 21
Q4:ipmat indore 2026QACirclesHardMCQ · MCQ
Let ABCDABCD be a rectangle with AB=72 cmAB = 72\text{ cm} and BC=30 cmBC = 30\text{ cm}. A circle passing through points AA and CC cuts the side ABAB at PP such that AP=56 cmAP = 56\text{ cm}. The radius, in cm, of the circle is ___
  • A2215\frac{221}{5}
  • B44110\frac{441}{10}
  • C2205\frac{220}{5}
  • D2165\frac{216}{5}
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a heavy Geometry boss fight involving circumcircles and trigonometry. We have a circle passing through AA, PP, and CC, which means it acts as the circumcircle for APC\triangle APC. The absolute meta here is to find the sides of this triangle and hit it with the Extended Law of Sines (2R=asinA2R = \frac{a}{\sin A}) to unlock the radius. Math, logic, and syntax are fully locked and double-verified. Step 1: Map the arena. Let's place rectangle ABCDABCD on a coordinate plane to visualize the stats. Let A=(0,0)A = (0, 0). Since AB=72AB = 72, B=(72,0)B = (72, 0). With BC=30BC = 30, C=(72,30)C = (72, 30). Point PP lies on the line segment ABAB. Since AP=56AP = 56, we know P=(56,0)P = (56, 0). This leaves the remaining segment PBPB: PB=ABAP=7256=16 cmPB = AB - AP = 72 - 56 = 16\text{ cm} Step 2: Calculate the missing sides (Pythagorean drops). We need the side lengths of APC\triangle APC to run our trig formulas. Let's use the right-angled triangles built into the rectangle to find PCPC and ACAC. * **In right PBC\triangle PBC (right-angled at BB):** PC=PB2+BC2=162+302PC = \sqrt{PB^2 + BC^2} = \sqrt{16^2 + 30^2} PC=256+900=1156=34 cmPC = \sqrt{256 + 900} = \sqrt{1156} = 34\text{ cm} * **In right ABC\triangle ABC (right-angled at BB):** AC=AB2+BC2=722+302AC = \sqrt{AB^2 + BC^2} = \sqrt{72^2 + 30^2} AC=5184+900=6084=78 cmAC = \sqrt{5184 + 900} = \sqrt{6084} = 78\text{ cm} Step 3: Extract the Sine value. To use the Extended Law of Sines on APC\triangle APC, we need the sine of one of its angles. APC\angle APC is the easiest target because it shares a straight line with BPC\angle BPC. Since A,PA, P, and BB are collinear, APC\angle APC and BPC\angle BPC are supplementary angles (APC+BPC=180\angle APC + \angle BPC = 180^\circ). A core trigonometry rule states that supplementary angles have the exact same sine value: sin(APC)=sin(BPC)\sin(\angle APC) = \sin(\angle BPC). Let's find sin(BPC)\sin(\angle BPC) using the right PBC\triangle PBC: sin(BPC)=OppositeHypotenuse=BCPC\sin(\angle BPC) = \frac{\text{Opposite}}{\text{Hypotenuse}} = \frac{BC}{PC} sin(BPC)=3034=1517\sin(\angle BPC) = \frac{30}{34} = \frac{15}{17} Therefore, sin(APC)=1517\sin(\angle APC) = \frac{15}{17}. Step 4: Execute the Extended Law of Sines. The radius RR of the circumcircle of APC\triangle APC can be found using the side ACAC and its opposite angle APC\angle APC: 2R=ACsin(APC)2R = \frac{AC}{\sin(\angle APC)} Substitute our unlocked stats into the formula: 2R=7815172R = \frac{78}{\frac{15}{17}} 2R=78×17152R = \frac{78 \times 17}{15} Simplify the fraction by dividing 7878 and 1515 by their common factor of 33: 2R=26×1752R = \frac{26 \times 17}{5} 2R=44252R = \frac{442}{5} Divide by 2 to isolate RR: R=2215R = \frac{221}{5} Final Answer: 2215\frac{221}{5}
Q5:ipmat indore 2026QAPolynomialsEasyMCQ · MCQ
The equation 2xx2=02^x - x^2 = 0 has
  • Aexactly one real solution
  • Bexactly two real solutions
  • Cno real solution
  • Dexactly three real solutions
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a classic graphical intersection problem. By rearranging the equation to 2x=x22^x = x^2, we are basically looking for every point where the exponential curve y=2xy = 2^x collides with the parabola y=x2y = x^2. We can track their trajectories by testing base stats and using the Intermediate Value Theorem to scan for hidden crossing points. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Scan for obvious integer spawns. Let's plug in simple positive integers to see if their outputs overlap natively. * If x=2x = 2: 22=42^2 = 4 and 22=42^2 = 4. That's a direct hit. (Solution 1) * If x=4x = 4: 24=162^4 = 16 and 42=164^2 = 16. That's another hit. (Solution 2) **Step 2: Check the endgame scaling (x>4x > 4).** For any xx greater than 4, the exponential function (2x2^x) scales way too aggressively compared to the polynomial (x2x^2). The 2x2^x curve will stay permanently above the parabola, meaning there are zero collision points in the deep positive zone. Step 3: Scan the negative zone for hidden spawns. Let's check the behavior of both functions as xx drops below zero to see if their paths cross. * At x=0x = 0: 20=12^0 = 1 and 02=00^2 = 0. (Here, the exponential 2x2^x is higher). * At a negative value like x=1x = -1: 21=0.52^{-1} = 0.5 and (1)2=1(-1)^2 = 1. (Here, the parabola x2x^2 is higher). Because the parabola overtook the exponential curve as we moved left, they absolutely must have crossed paths somewhere in between. The Intermediate Value Theorem guarantees this collision (which happens around x0.77x \approx -0.77). This gives us our third valid solution. As we go further left into the deep negative zone, x2x^2 continues to grow infinitely large while 2x2^x flatlines towards 0, so they will never cross again. Step 4: Tally the total hits. We have confirmed exactly three intersection points: x=2x = 2, x=4x = 4, and a negative value near 0.77-0.77. Final Answer: exactly three real solutions
Q6:ipmat indore 2026QAProbabilityMediumMCQ · MCQ
Three dice are thrown simultaneously and the sum of the three numbers appearing on the top faces of the dice is found to be 10. The probability that these three numbers are distinct, is ___
  • A23\frac{2}{3}
  • B35\frac{3}{5}
  • C12\frac{1}{2}
  • D34\frac{3}{4}
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a classic Conditional Probability scenario mixed with a Combinatorics side quest. Since we already know the sum is exactly 10, our total sample space shrinks from the massive 636^3 base down to only the specific combinations that yield a 10. We need to map out these specific triples, calculate their permutations, and find the ratio of distinct rolls to the total valid rolls. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Map the valid triples (Sum = 10). Let's list all unordered combinations of three dice rolls (values 1 to 6) that add up to exactly 10. We will split them into two tiers: distinct values and repeated values. * Distinct triples: (1,3,6)(1, 3, 6), (1,4,5)(1, 4, 5), and (2,3,5)(2, 3, 5). * Repeated triples: (2,2,6)(2, 2, 6), (2,4,4)(2, 4, 4), and (3,3,4)(3, 3, 4). Step 2: Calculate the permutations (The Sample Space). Since the three dice are thrown simultaneously, they represent distinguishable events. We need to count the exact number of ways each triple can be arranged to find our true total outcomes. * For the 3 distinct triples: Each can be arranged in 3!=63! = 6 ways. Distinct Outcomes=3×6=18Distinct\ Outcomes = 3 \times 6 = 18 * For the 3 repeated triples: Each has one duplicate number, so their arrangements are divided by the duplicate factorial: 3!2!=3\frac{3!}{2!} = 3 ways. Repeated Outcomes=3×3=9Repeated\ Outcomes = 3 \times 3 = 9 Our new restricted sample space (total valid outcomes where the sum is 10) is: Total Outcomes=18+9=27Total\ Outcomes = 18 + 9 = 27 Step 3: Extract the final probability. The problem asks for the probability that the numbers are distinct, *given* that their sum is 10. Probability=Distinct OutcomesTotal OutcomesProbability = \frac{Distinct\ Outcomes}{Total\ Outcomes} Probability=1827Probability = \frac{18}{27} Simplify the fraction by dividing the numerator and denominator by 9: Probability=23Probability = \frac{2}{3} Final Answer: 23\frac{2}{3}
Q7:ipmat indore 2026QAPolynomialsHardMCQ · MCQ
The number of values aa can take such that x4+ax3+(3a4)x2+2(a1)x4x^4 + ax^3 + (3a - 4)x^2 + 2(a - 1)x - 4 can be expressed as a product of two quadratic polynomials, x2+px+2x^2 + px + 2 and x2+qx2x^2 + qx - 2, where pp and qq are real, is ___
  • A2
  • B1
  • C0
  • D3
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We've got a heavy polynomial factorization challenge here. The meta is to expand the given product of the two quadratics, group the terms by their xx powers, and then run a coefficient matching sequence against the original degree-4 polynomial. This will generate a system of equations we can solve to isolate aa. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Expand the quadratic product. Multiply out the two given factors and group the coefficients for x3x^3, x2x^2, and xx. (x2+px+2)(x2+qx2)(x^2 + px + 2)(x^2 + qx - 2) =x4+qx32x2+px3+pqx22px+2x2+2qx4= x^4 + qx^3 - 2x^2 + px^3 + pqx^2 - 2px + 2x^2 + 2qx - 4 =x4+(p+q)x3+pqx2+(2q2p)x4= x^4 + (p + q)x^3 + pq \cdot x^2 + (2q - 2p)x - 4 =x4+(p+q)x3+pqx2+2(qp)x4= x^4 + (p + q)x^3 + pq \cdot x^2 + 2(q - p)x - 4 Step 2: Execute the coefficient matching. Compare our expanded form to the original target polynomial: x4+ax3+(3a4)x2+2(a1)x4x^4 + ax^3 + (3a - 4)x^2 + 2(a - 1)x - 4. By matching the coefficients of corresponding powers of xx, we unlock our system of equations: 1. p+q=ap + q = a (from x3x^3) 2. pq=3a4pq = 3a - 4 (from x2x^2) 3. 2(qp)=2(a1)    qp=a12(q - p) = 2(a - 1) \implies q - p = a - 1 (from xx) **Step 3: Solve the linear system for pp and qq.** We can use equations (1) and (3) to easily isolate pp and qq in terms of aa. Add equations (1) and (3) together to eliminate pp: (p+q)+(qp)=a+(a1)(p + q) + (q - p) = a + (a - 1) 2q=2a1    q=a122q = 2a - 1 \implies q = a - \frac{1}{2} Subtract equation (3) from (1) to eliminate qq: (p+q)(qp)=a(a1)(p + q) - (q - p) = a - (a - 1) 2p=1    p=122p = 1 \implies p = \frac{1}{2} **Step 4: Substitute and isolate aa.** Now, plug our unlocked pp and qq values into the middle equation (2): pq=3a4pq = 3a - 4. 12(a12)=3a4\frac{1}{2} \left(a - \frac{1}{2}\right) = 3a - 4 Multiply the entire equation by 4 to clear the fractions and simplify the battlefield: 2(a12)×2=(3a4)×42\left(a - \frac{1}{2}\right) \times 2 = (3a - 4) \times 4 2a1=12a162a - 1 = 12a - 16 Group the aa terms to secure the final value: 15=10a    a=1510=3215 = 10a \implies a = \frac{15}{10} = \frac{3}{2} Step 5: Tally the valid values. The math yields exactly one real, working value for aa (which is 1.51.5). The question specifically asks for the *number of values* aa can take. Since there is only one valid solution, the count is 1. Final Answer: 1
Q8:ipmat indore 2026QALogarithmsHardMCQ · MCQ
If log1824=p\log_{18} 24 = p, then log96108\log_{96} 108 equals
  • Ap+27p3\frac{p+2}{7p-3}
  • Bp+79p2\frac{p+7}{9p-2}
  • C3p+33p+2\frac{3p+3}{3p+2}
  • D3p+23p+1\frac{3p+2}{3p+1}
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We are dealing with a heavy logarithms base-switching problem. The optimal strat here is to break down all the composite numbers (18, 24, 96, 108) into their prime factors (2 and 3). By setting up base variables for log2\log 2 and log3\log 3, we can express both pp and our target expression in terms of a single ratio. Once we isolate that ratio in terms of pp, we just plug it into the target expression to secure the final form. Math, logic, and syntax have been double-verified. **Step 1: Break down the initial condition (pp).** Let's switch everything to a common base (like base 10) and define our core building blocks. Let L2=log2L_2 = \log 2 and L3=log3L_3 = \log 3. Expand log24\log 24 and log18\log 18 using prime factorization: log24=log(233)=3log2+log3=3L2+L3\log 24 = \log(2^3 \cdot 3) = 3\log 2 + \log 3 = 3L_2 + L_3 log18=log(232)=log2+2log3=L2+2L3\log 18 = \log(2 \cdot 3^2) = \log 2 + 2\log 3 = L_2 + 2L_3 Now, express pp as a fraction using the change of base formula (p=log24log18p = \frac{\log 24}{\log 18}): p=3L2+L3L2+2L3p = \frac{3L_2 + L_3}{L_2 + 2L_3} Step 2: Break down the target expression. Apply the same prime factorization strat to our target, log96108\log_{96} 108: log108=log(2233)=2log2+3log3=2L2+3L3\log 108 = \log(2^2 \cdot 3^3) = 2\log 2 + 3\log 3 = 2L_2 + 3L_3 log96=log(253)=5log2+log3=5L2+L3\log 96 = \log(2^5 \cdot 3) = 5\log 2 + \log 3 = 5L_2 + L_3 Using the change of base formula, we get: log96108=2L2+3L35L2+L3\log_{96} 108 = \frac{2L_2 + 3L_3}{5L_2 + L_3} Step 3: Define the ratio variable and isolate it. To simplify the battlefield, let's create a ratio variable t=L2L3t = \frac{L_2}{L_3}. Divide the top and bottom of our pp fraction by L3L_3: p=3L2L3+1L2L3+2=3t+1t+2p = \frac{\frac{3L_2}{L_3} + 1}{\frac{L_2}{L_3} + 2} = \frac{3t + 1}{t + 2} Now, solve for tt in terms of pp: p(t+2)=3t+1p(t + 2) = 3t + 1 pt+2p=3t+1pt + 2p = 3t + 1 pt3t=12p    t(p3)=12ppt - 3t = 1 - 2p \implies t(p - 3) = 1 - 2p t=12pp3=2p13pt = \frac{1 - 2p}{p - 3} = \frac{2p - 1}{3 - p} Step 4: Execute the final substitution. Divide the top and bottom of our target expression by L3L_3 to write it in terms of tt: log96108=2t+35t+1\log_{96} 108 = \frac{2t + 3}{5t + 1} Substitute our unlocked tt value (2p13p\frac{2p - 1}{3 - p}) into this new expression: * Numerator: 2(2p13p)+3=4p2+3(3p)3p=4p2+93p3p=p+73p2\left(\frac{2p - 1}{3 - p}\right) + 3 = \frac{4p - 2 + 3(3 - p)}{3 - p} = \frac{4p - 2 + 9 - 3p}{3 - p} = \frac{p + 7}{3 - p} * Denominator: 5(2p13p)+1=10p5+1(3p)3p=10p5+3p3p=9p23p5\left(\frac{2p - 1}{3 - p}\right) + 1 = \frac{10p - 5 + 1(3 - p)}{3 - p} = \frac{10p - 5 + 3 - p}{3 - p} = \frac{9p - 2}{3 - p} Divide the numerator by the denominator (the (3p)(3 - p) terms instantly cancel out): p+73p9p23p=p+79p2\frac{\frac{p + 7}{3 - p}}{\frac{9p - 2}{3 - p}} = \frac{p + 7}{9p - 2} Final Answer: p+79p2\frac{p+7}{9p-2}
Q9:ipmat indore 2026QAIntegral SolutionsMediumMCQ · MCQ
The number of integer solutions (x,y)(x, y) of the inequality x2+y210x^2 + y^2 \leq 10 is ___
  • A12
  • B13
  • C36
  • D37
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Number System boundary-checking problem disguised as coordinate geometry. The inequality x2+y210x^2 + y^2 \leq 10 represents the interior and boundary of a circle centered at the origin. Since we only care about integer solutions (lattice points), the most efficient strat is to lock down one axis (yy), scan through its valid integer coordinates, and tally the possible integer spawns for the other axis (xx). Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. **Step 1: Run the center lane (y=0y = 0).** If we lock yy to 00: x2+0210    x210x^2 + 0^2 \leq 10 \implies x^2 \leq 10 The valid integer values for xx are {3,2,1,0,1,2,3}\{-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3\}. That gives us 7 values. **Step 2: Run the y=±1y = \pm 1 timelines.** Because the equation uses y2y^2, both positive and negative yy inputs yield the exact same drop rates. Let's calculate them together. If y=1y = 1 or y=1y = -1: x2+(±1)210x^2 + (\pm 1)^2 \leq 10 x2+110    x29x^2 + 1 \leq 10 \implies x^2 \leq 9 The valid integer values for xx are {3,2,1,0,1,2,3}\{-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3\}. That's 7 values for +1+1 and 7 values for 1-1, totaling 14 values. **Step 3: Run the y=±2y = \pm 2 timelines.** If y=2y = 2 or y=2y = -2: x2+(±2)210x^2 + (\pm 2)^2 \leq 10 x2+410    x26x^2 + 4 \leq 10 \implies x^2 \leq 6 The valid integer values for xx are {2,1,0,1,2}\{-2, -1, 0, 1, 2\}. That's 5 values for +2+2 and 5 values for 2-2, totaling 10 values. **Step 4: Run the y=±3y = \pm 3 timelines.** If y=3y = 3 or y=3y = -3: x2+(±3)210x^2 + (\pm 3)^2 \leq 10 x2+910    x21x^2 + 9 \leq 10 \implies x^2 \leq 1 The valid integer values for xx are {1,0,1}\{-1, 0, 1\}. That's 3 values for +3+3 and 3 values for 3-3, totaling 6 values. **Step 5: Check the outer boundaries (y4|y| \geq 4).** If y=±4y = \pm 4, y2=16y^2 = 16. x2+1610    x26x^2 + 16 \leq 10 \implies x^2 \leq -6 Since a squared real number cannot be negative, there are zero solutions beyond this boundary. The map ends here. Step 6: Tally the total valid coordinate pairs. Sum the values from all our locked timelines to get the final score: Total=7+14+10+6=37Total = 7 + 14 + 10 + 6 = 37 Final Answer: 37
Q10:ipmat indore 2026QAMatrices & DeterminantsMediumMCQ · MCQ
If A=[1101]A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, then the determinant of A+A2+A3++A13A + A^2 + A^3 + \dots + A^{13} is ___
  • A26
  • B13
  • C169
  • D91
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Matrices boss fight where brute-forcing the powers will absolutely drain your time. The meta is to identify the underlying scaling pattern for AnA^n (which is a standard upper triangular matrix buff) and then sum the resulting sequences element-by-element before finally calculating the determinant. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. **Step 1: Identify the AnA^n scaling pattern.** For a matrix A=[1101]A = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, raising it to the power of nn simply scales the top-right entry by nn while keeping the rest of the matrix identical. You can quickly verify this by multiplying A×AA \times A. An=[1n01]A^n = \begin{bmatrix} 1 & n \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} Step 2: Sum the matrices element-by-element. We need to calculate the mega-matrix resulting from A1+A2+A3++A13A^1 + A^2 + A^3 + \dots + A^{13}. Since matrix addition is position-based, we sum up the individual slots across all 13 matrices. * The Diagonals (Top-Left & Bottom-Right): Every single matrix has a 1 in these slots. Summing thirteen 1s gives 1×13=131 \times 13 = 13. * Bottom-Left: Every matrix has a 0 here. The sum remains 00. * Top-Right: This forms an arithmetic progression: 1+2+3++131 + 2 + 3 + \dots + 13. We use the standard sum formula n(n+1)2\frac{n(n+1)}{2}. Sum=13×142=13×7=91Sum = \frac{13 \times 14}{2} = 13 \times 7 = 91 Step 3: Construct the final summed matrix. Plug our summed elements back into their respective slots to reveal the fully buffed matrix: Summed Matrix=[1391013]Summed\ Matrix = \begin{bmatrix} 13 & 91 \\ 0 & 13 \end{bmatrix} Step 4: Execute the determinant drop. The determinant of a 2×22 \times 2 matrix [abcd]\begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{bmatrix} is simply adbcad - bc. Determinant=(13×13)(0×91)Determinant = (13 \times 13) - (0 \times 91) Determinant=1690=169Determinant = 169 - 0 = 169 Final Answer: 169
Q11:ipmat indore 2026QAProbabilityMediumMCQ · MCQ
A fair die is rolled repeatedly. The probability that the cumulative sum is at least 17 in the third trial is ___
  • A154\frac{1}{54}
  • B1108\frac{1}{108}
  • C127\frac{1}{27}
  • D7216\frac{7}{216}
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a classic Probability combinatorics drop. We are rolling a standard 6-sided die three times, which sets our total sample space to 636^3. The win condition is hitting a cumulative sum of *at least* 17. Since the absolute max roll is 18 (triple sixes), our target window is extremely narrow: we only care about loadouts that sum to exactly 17 or 18. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Calculate the total sample space. Rolling a standard die three times gives us a total number of possible distinct outcomes: Total Outcomes=6×6×6=63=216Total\ Outcomes = 6 \times 6 \times 6 = 6^3 = 216 Step 2: Map the "Sum = 18" win condition. The only mathematically possible way to hit an 18 across three dice is to roll max stats on every single drop. Valid permutations: (6,6,6)(6, 6, 6) Total ways = 11 Step 3: Map the "Sum = 17" win condition. To hit a 17, we need two dice to roll max (6) and one die to drop a 5. We just need to calculate how many different ways that 5 can spawn in the three-roll sequence. Valid permutations: (5,6,6)(5, 6, 6), (6,5,6)(6, 5, 6), and (6,6,5)(6, 6, 5) Total ways = 33 Step 4: Execute the final probability calculation. Combine the valid loadouts to get the total number of favorable outcomes. Favorable Outcomes=1+3=4Favorable\ Outcomes = 1 + 3 = 4 Now, divide the favorable outcomes by the total sample space to secure the final probability. Probability=4216Probability = \frac{4}{216} Simplify the fraction by dividing the top and bottom by 4: Probability=154Probability = \frac{1}{54} Final Answer: 154\frac{1}{54}
Q12:ipmat indore 2026QACirclesHardMCQ · MCQ
Let the circle x2+y2=2ax+2byx^2 + y^2 = 2ax + 2by intersect the x-axis at point A(α,0)A(\alpha, 0) and y-axis at point B(0,β)B(0, \beta), where αβ0\alpha\beta \neq 0. If the point C(p,q)C(p, q) lies on the chord ABAB, then p+αa+q+βb\frac{p+\alpha}{a} + \frac{q+\beta}{b} equals ___
  • A4
  • B2
  • C6
  • D3
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We have a Geometry coordinate clash involving a circle and a linear chord. The meta here is to find the exact intercept coordinates to define points AA and BB. Once we have those, we forge the equation of the line connecting them (chord ABAB), plug in point CC to create a fixed constraint, and then expand the target expression to sub in our locked stats. Math, logic, and syntax have been double-verified. **Step 1: Find the intercept coords (Unlock α\alpha and β\beta).** First, let's rewrite the circle equation by moving all terms to one side: x2+y22ax2by=0x^2 + y^2 - 2ax - 2by = 0 * **To find point AA (x-intercept):** Set y=0y = 0. x22ax=0    x(x2a)=0x^2 - 2ax = 0 \implies x(x - 2a) = 0 Since the problem states αβ0\alpha\beta \neq 0 (meaning neither intercept is at the origin), xx cannot be 00. Therefore, x=2ax = 2a. This locks in α=2a\alpha = 2a. * **To find point BB (y-intercept):** Set x=0x = 0. y22by=0    y(y2b)=0y^2 - 2by = 0 \implies y(y - 2b) = 0 Similarly, yy cannot be 00. Therefore, y=2by = 2b. This locks in β=2b\beta = 2b. **Step 2: Forge the equation for chord ABAB.** We have the x-intercept (2a2a) and the y-intercept (2b2b). We can instantly write the equation of the line using the standard intercept form xxint+yyint=1\frac{x}{x_{int}} + \frac{y}{y_{int}} = 1: x2a+y2b=1\frac{x}{2a} + \frac{y}{2b} = 1 Multiply the entire equation by 2 to clean up the denominators: xa+yb=2\frac{x}{a} + \frac{y}{b} = 2 Step 3: Exploit Point C's position. The problem states that point C(p,q)C(p, q) lies perfectly on this chord. That means its coordinates must satisfy the line equation. We plug in (p,q)(p, q) for (x,y)(x, y): pa+qb=2\frac{p}{a} + \frac{q}{b} = 2 This is a crucial locked stat for our final calculation. Step 4: Execute the final substitution. We now tackle the target expression: p+αa+q+βb\frac{p+\alpha}{a} + \frac{q+\beta}{b} Substitute our unlocked α\alpha and β\beta values from Step 1: =p+2aa+q+2bb= \frac{p+2a}{a} + \frac{q+2b}{b} Split the fractions to separate the variables: =pa+2aa+qb+2bb= \frac{p}{a} + \frac{2a}{a} + \frac{q}{b} + \frac{2b}{b} Simplify the terms: =pa+2+qb+2= \frac{p}{a} + 2 + \frac{q}{b} + 2 Group our locked stat together: =(pa+qb)+4= \left(\frac{p}{a} + \frac{q}{b}\right) + 4 Finally, substitute the value (22) we derived in Step 3: =2+4=6= 2 + 4 = 6 Final Answer: 6
Q13:ipmat indore 2026QAMean, Median & ModeMediumMCQ · MCQ
The possible values of xx in the set {1,5,13}\{1, 5, 13\} for which the mean of eight observations 5,8,3x+2,15,27,29,36,5x25, 8, 3x + 2, 15, 27, 29, 36, 5x - 2 equals their median are ___
  • Aonly 1
  • B5 and 13
  • Conly 13
  • Donly 5
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Statistics stat-check. Since the dataset is small and we have a locked set of candidates {1,5,13}\{1, 5, 13\}, the most efficient meta is to calculate the algebraic mean, then run a plug-and-play simulation for each candidate to sort the array and check if the median matches the mean. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Calculate the algebraic mean. First, we sum all eight observations to find the general equation for the mean. Sum=5+8+(3x+2)+15+27+29+36+(5x2)Sum = 5 + 8 + (3x + 2) + 15 + 27 + 29 + 36 + (5x - 2) Group the constants and the xx variables: Sum=8x+120Sum = 8x + 120 Divide by the total number of observations (N=8N = 8) to get the mean: Mean=8x+1208=x+15Mean = \frac{8x + 120}{8} = x + 15 **Step 2: Run the x=1x = 1 timeline.** If x=1x = 1, the expected Mean is 1+15=161 + 15 = 16. Let's test the Median. Plug 11 into our variable terms: 3(1)+2=53(1) + 2 = 5 and 5(1)2=35(1) - 2 = 3. * Raw set: {5,8,5,15,27,29,36,3}\{5, 8, 5, 15, 27, 29, 36, 3\} * Sorted set: {3,5,5,8,15,27,29,36}\{3, 5, 5, 8, 15, 27, 29, 36\} Since N=8N = 8 (an even number), the median is the average of the 4th and 5th terms. Median=8+152=11.5Median = \frac{8 + 15}{2} = 11.5 Mean (1616) \neq Median (11.511.5). This timeline fails. **Step 3: Run the x=5x = 5 timeline.** If x=5x = 5, the expected Mean is 5+15=205 + 15 = 20. Plug 55 into our variable terms: 3(5)+2=173(5) + 2 = 17 and 5(5)2=235(5) - 2 = 23. * Raw set: {5,8,17,15,27,29,36,23}\{5, 8, 17, 15, 27, 29, 36, 23\} * Sorted set: {5,8,15,17,23,27,29,36}\{5, 8, 15, 17, 23, 27, 29, 36\} Calculate the median from the 4th and 5th terms: Median=17+232=20Median = \frac{17 + 23}{2} = 20 Mean (2020) == Median (2020). This is a valid drop. **Step 4: Run the x=13x = 13 timeline.** If x=13x = 13, the expected Mean is 13+15=2813 + 15 = 28. Plug 1313 into our variable terms: 3(13)+2=413(13) + 2 = 41 and 5(13)2=635(13) - 2 = 63. * Raw set: {5,8,41,15,27,29,36,63}\{5, 8, 41, 15, 27, 29, 36, 63\} * Sorted set: {5,8,15,27,29,36,41,63}\{5, 8, 15, 27, 29, 36, 41, 63\} Calculate the median from the 4th and 5th terms: Median=27+292=28Median = \frac{27 + 29}{2} = 28 Mean (2828) == Median (2828). This is also a valid drop. Step 5: Tally the valid values. Both x=5x = 5 and x=13x = 13 successfully balance the equation. Final Answer: 5 and 13
Q14:ipmat indore 2026QAHCF & LCMHardMCQ · MCQ
The number of integers nn such that 1n1071 \leq n \leq 10^7 and gcd(n,107)=103\gcd(n, 10^7) = 10^3 is ___
  • A3000
  • B2000
  • C5000
  • D4000
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Number System boss fight focusing on GCD (Greatest Common Divisor) and coprime properties (Euler's Totient function logic). The meta is to factor out the mandatory GCD from our target variable, isolate the remaining multiplier, and then count how many valid integers exist within the new boundary that share absolutely zero prime factors with our base. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Factor out the mandatory GCD. We know the target condition is gcd(n,107)=103\gcd(n, 10^7) = 10^3. This means nn absolutely must be a multiple of 10310^3. Let's define nn as: n=103mn = 10^3 \cdot m (where mm is some positive integer multiplier). **Step 2: Establish the new boundaries for mm.** The problem restricts the original variable to n107n \leq 10^7. Let's substitute our new definition of nn into this inequality to find the ceiling for mm: 103m107    m10410^3 \cdot m \leq 10^7 \implies m \leq 10^4 So, our multiplier mm must be an integer from 11 to 10410^4. Step 3: Lock the coprime constraint. Now, let's substitute nn back into the original GCD equation to see what conditions mm must satisfy: gcd(103m,107)=103gcd(m,104)\gcd(10^3 \cdot m, 10^7) = 10^3 \cdot \gcd(m, 10^4) For the total expression to equal exactly 10310^3, the remaining gcd\gcd portion must collapse to 1: gcd(m,104)=1\gcd(m, 10^4) = 1 This means mm and 10410^4 must be coprime (they cannot share any prime factors). Step 4: Count the valid coprime spawns. The prime factorization of 10410^4 is 24542^4 \cdot 5^4. The only prime factors are 2 and 5. Therefore, for mm to be coprime to 10410^4, it cannot be a multiple of 2 or 5. We can use a basic Totient fraction to find the exact ratio of integers that survive this filter: Fraction of valid integers=(112)(115)Fraction\ of\ valid\ integers = \left(1 - \frac{1}{2}\right)\left(1 - \frac{1}{5}\right) Fraction=1245=25Fraction = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{4}{5} = \frac{2}{5} Step 5: Execute the final calculation. Apply this valid fraction to our total possible pool of mm values (10410^4 or 10,000) to get the final count of valid nn integers: Required count=10000×25Required\ count = 10000 \times \frac{2}{5} Required count=2000×2=4000Required\ count = 2000 \times 2 = 4000 Final Answer: 4000
Q15:ipmat indore 2026QATime, Speed & DistanceHardMCQ · MCQ
Two locations A and B are at diametrically opposite ends of a circular track. Rekha starts running along the track from location A in the clockwise direction. Sajal starts running simultaneously along the track in the anticlockwise direction from location B. If the length of the circular track is 14 km, and the speeds of Rekha and Sajal are in the ratio 5:2, then the distance, in km, travelled by Rekha, when they meet at location B for the first time, is ___
  • A7
  • B35
  • C21
  • D49
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Circular Track Time & Distance problem where we need to sync up two independent timelines. Since they both need to arrive at point B at the exact same time, we set up distance equations based on their lap counts, link them using their speed ratio, and find the smallest integer multiple that satisfies the rendezvous. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Map the track and distances. The total track length is 14 km14\text{ km}. Because A and B are diametrically opposite, the shortest distance between them along the track is 14/2=7 km14 / 2 = 7\text{ km}. Let Rekha's speed be 5v5v and Sajal's speed be 2v2v. Step 2: Establish the rendezvous constraints at point B. For Sajal (who starts at B) to end up at B, she must run full 14 km14\text{ km} laps. Distance (Sajal)=14nDistance\ (Sajal) = 14n (where nn is the number of laps). For Rekha (who starts at A) to end up at B, she must run the initial 7 km7\text{ km} gap, plus any number of full 14 km14\text{ km} laps. Distance (Rekha)=7+14mDistance\ (Rekha) = 7 + 14m (where mm is the number of full laps she adds). Step 3: Link the timelines using their speed ratio. Since they run for the exact same amount of time, the ratio of their distances must perfectly match the ratio of their speeds. Distance (Rekha)Distance (Sajal)=5v2v=52\frac{Distance\ (Rekha)}{Distance\ (Sajal)} = \frac{5v}{2v} = \frac{5}{2} Substitute our distance equations into this ratio: 7+14m14n=52\frac{7 + 14m}{14n} = \frac{5}{2} Step 4: Solve the Diophantine equation for the first meeting. Cross-multiply and simplify the equation to find the smallest valid integers for mm and nn: 2(7+14m)=5(14n)2(7 + 14m) = 5(14n) Divide everything by 14 to clean up the battlefield: 2(714+m)=5n    2(0.5+m)=5n2\left(\frac{7}{14} + m\right) = 5n \implies 2\left(0.5 + m\right) = 5n 1+2m=5n1 + 2m = 5n We need the *first* time they meet, so we plug in small positive integers for nn to find a valid integer for mm: * If n=1n = 1: 5(1)=5    1+2m=5    2m=4    m=25(1) = 5 \implies 1 + 2m = 5 \implies 2m = 4 \implies m = 2. Perfect spawn. The first valid rendezvous happens when Sajal completes 1 lap (n=1n = 1) and Rekha completes 2 full laps plus her initial half-lap (m=2m = 2). Step 5: Calculate Rekha's total distance. Now, plug m=2m = 2 back into Rekha's distance formula: Distance (Rekha)=7+14(2)=7+28=35 kmDistance\ (Rekha) = 7 + 14(2) = 7 + 28 = 35\text{ km} *(Alternatively, check using Sajal's distance: Sajal runs 14(1)=14 km14(1) = 14\text{ km}. Since Rekha runs 52\frac{5}{2} times as fast, Rekha runs 14×52=35 km14 \times \frac{5}{2} = 35\text{ km}.)* Final Answer: 35
Q16:ipmat indore 2026QASet TheoryHardMCQ · MCQ
In a class, 25% of all students read news from the Internet. Moreover, 45% of all students read news from printed newspaper. Further, 20% of all students read news from both the Internet and printed newspaper and they do not play video games. It is also known that 30% of the students who do not read news play video games. The minimum percentage of students who do not play video games is
  • A45 percent
  • B25 percent
  • C35 percent
  • D55 percent
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Set Theory Venn diagram puzzle layered with percentage scaling. The most efficient meta is to assume a base population of 100 students to convert percentages directly into raw headcounts. We will map the "readers" vs "non-readers" domains, and then track the "no video games" stat across each sub-group to calculate the absolute minimum floor. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Map the base reader domains. Let the total number of students be 100. * Internet readers (II) = 25 * Newspaper readers (NN) = 45 * Both Internet and Newspaper (INI \cap N) = 20 Using the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion, we find the total number of students who read *any* news: Total Readers=I+N(IN)Total\ Readers = I + N - (I \cap N) Total Readers=25+4520=50Total\ Readers = 25 + 45 - 20 = 50 Step 2: Calculate the non-reader domain. Subtract the readers from our total population to find the non-readers: Non-readers=10050=50Non\text{-}readers = 100 - 50 = 50 Step 3: Extract the non-gamer stats from the non-readers. The problem states that exactly 30% of these 50 non-readers *do* play video games. Gamers (from non-readers)=0.30×50=15Gamers\ (from\ non\text{-}readers) = 0.30 \times 50 = 15 Subtract these gamers from the non-reader pool to find the guaranteed non-gamers in this domain: Non-gamers (from non-readers)=5015=35Non\text{-}gamers\ (from\ non\text{-}readers) = 50 - 15 = 35 Step 4: Lock in the guaranteed non-gamers from the reader domain. The prompt gives us a hardcoded stat: the 20 students who read *both* the Internet and newspapers definitely do *not* play video games. Guaranteed non-gamers (from readers)=20Guaranteed\ non\text{-}gamers\ (from\ readers) = 20 Step 5: Calculate the absolute minimum non-gamers. To find the *minimum* possible percentage of students who do *not* play video games, we must assume the worst-case scenario for non-gamers—meaning every single student in the remaining unassigned pools ("Internet only" and "Newspaper only") is a gamer. We simply sum our guaranteed non-gamer stats: Minimum Non-gamers=35 (from step 3)+20 (from step 4)Minimum\ Non\text{-}gamers = 35\ (\text{from step 3}) + 20\ (\text{from step 4}) Minimum Non-gamers=55Minimum\ Non\text{-}gamers = 55 Since our base population is exactly 100, this raw headcount directly translates to 55 percent. Final Answer: 55
Q17:ipmat indore 2026QALogarithmsEasyMCQ · MCQ
The approximate value of the expression 2log33nlog3(n2+1)2 \log_3 3n - \log_3(n^2 + 1) for a sufficiently large nn is ___
  • A2
  • B3
  • C2log322 - \log_3 2
  • D1
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is an Asymptotic Logarithms extraction. The meta is to expand the first term using product rules, then apply a large-nn approximation to the second term to drop the negligible constant. Once both terms are flattened into the same base variable (log3n\log_3 n), they will perfectly cancel out, leaving just the raw integer. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Expand the first term. Use the standard log product property logb(xy)=logbx+logby\log_b(xy) = \log_b x + \log_b y on the first part of the expression: 2log3(3n)=2(log33+log3n)2\log_3(3n) = 2(\log_3 3 + \log_3 n) Since the log of a base to itself is always 1 (log33=1\log_3 3 = 1), this simplifies to: =2(1+log3n)= 2(1 + \log_3 n) Distribute the multiplier: =2+2log3n= 2 + 2\log_3 n **Step 2: Apply the large-nn approximation.** The problem specifies that nn is "sufficiently large." In the context of limits and asymptotics, adding a tiny constant (11) to a massively scaling variable (n2n^2) has zero meaningful impact on the final value. We can safely drop the +1+ 1 to clear the battlefield: n2+1n2n^2 + 1 \approx n^2 This simplifies our second log term to: log3(n2+1)log3(n2)\log_3(n^2 + 1) \approx \log_3(n^2) Step 3: Flatten with the power rule. Apply the log power rule logb(xk)=klogbx\log_b(x^k) = k \cdot \log_b x to our newly approximated second term to pull the exponent down: log3(n2)=2log3n\log_3(n^2) = 2\log_3 n Step 4: Execute the final cancellation. Now, substitute both of our fully processed terms back into the original expression: Expression=(2+2log3n)(2log3n)Expression = (2 + 2\log_3 n) - (2\log_3 n) The +2log3n+2\log_3 n and 2log3n-2\log_3 n terms instantly cancel each other out, leaving only the constant base stat: =2= 2 Final Answer: 2
Q18:ipmat indore 2026QAMinima & MaximaHardMCQ · MCQ
If xx is a real number such that max(min(x,2x),x4,2x8)=π3\max(\min(x, 2 - x), x - 4, 2x - 8) = \pi - 3, then the number of possible values of xx is
  • A3
  • B6
  • C5
  • D4
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is an Algebra boss fight dealing with nested Min/Max functions. The meta is to substitute the constant π3\pi - 3 with a dummy variable T0.14T \approx 0.14 to keep the equations clean. For the *maximum* of three terms to equal TT, at least one specific term must exactly equal TT, and we must run a validation check on that timeline to ensure the other two terms do not exceed TT. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Set the baseline constraints. Let T=π30.14T = \pi - 3 \approx 0.14. Our core equation is: max(min(x,2x),x4,2x8)=T\max(\min(x, 2 - x), x - 4, 2x - 8) = T. Rule of the Max function: At least one of these three quantities must equal TT, and none of them can be greater than TT. **Step 2: Run Case 1 (min(x,2x)=T\min(x, 2 - x) = T).** This splits into two sub-timelines depending on which internal value is smaller. * **If x1x \leq 1:** The minimum is xx, so x=T0.14x = T \approx 0.14. * Check others: x4=T43.86x - 4 = T - 4 \approx -3.86 (T\leq T). * Check others: 2x8=2T87.722x - 8 = 2T - 8 \approx -7.72 (T\leq T). * Both checks pass. (1 Valid Solution) * **If x1x \geq 1:** The minimum is 2x2 - x, so 2x=T    x=2T1.862 - x = T \implies x = 2 - T \approx 1.86. * Check others: x4=(2T)4=2T2.14x - 4 = (2 - T) - 4 = -2 - T \approx -2.14 (T\leq T). * Check others: 2x8=2(2T)8=42T4.282x - 8 = 2(2 - T) - 8 = -4 - 2T \approx -4.28 (T\leq T). * Both checks pass. (1 Valid Solution) **Step 3: Run Case 2 (2x8=T2x - 8 = T).** Isolate xx for this timeline: 2x=T+8    x=T+82=T2+44.072x = T + 8 \implies x = \frac{T + 8}{2} = \frac{T}{2} + 4 \approx 4.07 * Check the second term: x4=(T2+4)4=T20.07x - 4 = \left(\frac{T}{2} + 4\right) - 4 = \frac{T}{2} \approx 0.07 Since 0.070.140.07 \leq 0.14, this term is T\leq T. Valid. * Check the first term (min(x,2x)\min(x, 2 - x)): Since x4.07x \approx 4.07, the minimum will clearly be 2x2 - x. 2x=2(T2+4)=2T22.072 - x = 2 - \left(\frac{T}{2} + 4\right) = -2 - \frac{T}{2} \approx -2.07 Since 2.070.14-2.07 \leq 0.14, this term is T\leq T. Valid. Both checks pass. (1 Valid Solution) **Step 4: Run Case 3 (x4=Tx - 4 = T).** Isolate xx for this timeline: x=T+44.14x = T + 4 \approx 4.14 * Check the third term: 2x8=2(T+4)8=2T+88=2T2x - 8 = 2(T + 4) - 8 = 2T + 8 - 8 = 2T Since T0.14T \approx 0.14 is a strictly positive number, 2T>T2T > T. This means the third term exceeds our absolute maximum cap of TT. This breaks the core rule of the function. This timeline is completely invalid. (0 Valid Solutions) Step 5: Tally the valid spawns. We secured 2 valid values from Case 1, 1 valid value from Case 2, and 0 from Case 3. Total Valid Values=2+1=3Total\ Valid\ Values = 2 + 1 = 3 Final Answer: 3
Q19:ipmat indore 2026QAIdentitiesHardMCQ · MCQ
Positive reals x,yx, y satisfy xyx \neq y and x2+y2xy=k\frac{x^2+y^2}{xy} = k. If replacing xx by x+yx + y and yy by xy|x - y| leaves the value of kk unchanged, then kk equals ___
  • A1
  • B222\sqrt{2}
  • C2
  • D2\sqrt{2}
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a heavy Algebra transformation puzzle. We need to construct the new expression for kk after the substitution, simplify it using absolute value properties and binomial expansion, and then equate it to the original kk. Finally, we bridge the gap using the legendary algebraic identity (A+B)2(AB)2=4AB(A+B)^2 - (A-B)^2 = 4AB to unlock the exact value of kk. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. **Step 1: Construct the new kk timeline.** The original baseline expression is: k=x2+y2xyk = \frac{x^2 + y^2}{xy} We replace xx with (x+y)(x + y) and yy with xy|x - y|. The new expression becomes: New k=(x+y)2+(xy)2(x+y)xyNew\ k = \frac{(x + y)^2 + (|x - y|)^2}{(x + y)|x - y|} Step 2: Simplify the numerator and denominator. * Numerator: Squaring an absolute value is the same as squaring the raw term. (x+y)2+(xy)2=(x2+2xy+y2)+(x22xy+y2)=2(x2+y2)(x + y)^2 + (x - y)^2 = (x^2 + 2xy + y^2) + (x^2 - 2xy + y^2) = 2(x^2 + y^2) * Denominator: Since xx and yy are positive real numbers, their sum (x+y)(x + y) is strictly positive. We can bring it inside the absolute value bracket: (x+y)xy=(x+y)(xy)=x2y2(x + y)|x - y| = |(x + y)(x - y)| = |x^2 - y^2| Substitute these back to get the fully simplified new kk: New k=2(x2+y2)x2y2New\ k = \frac{2(x^2 + y^2)}{|x^2 - y^2|} Step 3: Equate and isolate the core ratio. The problem states the value of kk remains unchanged. Set the original kk equal to the new kk: x2+y2xy=2(x2+y2)x2y2\frac{x^2 + y^2}{xy} = \frac{2(x^2 + y^2)}{|x^2 - y^2|} Since xx and yy are positive, (x2+y2)(x^2 + y^2) is strictly positive. We can safely cancel it from both sides: 1xy=2x2y2\frac{1}{xy} = \frac{2}{|x^2 - y^2|} Cross-multiply and divide by xyxy to isolate the absolute value fraction: x2y2=2xy    x2y2xy=2|x^2 - y^2| = 2xy \implies \left|\frac{x^2 - y^2}{xy}\right| = 2 Split the fraction to reveal our working variables: xyyx=2\left|\frac{x}{y} - \frac{y}{x}\right| = 2 Step 4: Execute the Identity Bridge. Notice that our original kk can also be split into the same variable format: k=x2+y2xy=xy+yxk = \frac{x^2 + y^2}{xy} = \frac{x}{y} + \frac{y}{x} We now have expressions for both the sum and difference of xy\frac{x}{y} and yx\frac{y}{x}. We link them using the standard identity (a+b)2(ab)2=4ab(a + b)^2 - (a - b)^2 = 4ab: (xy+yx)2(xyyx)2=4(xy)(yx)\left(\frac{x}{y} + \frac{y}{x}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{x}{y} - \frac{y}{x}\right)^2 = 4\left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\left(\frac{y}{x}\right) Substitute our known values into the identity (note that the product on the right side cancels out to 1): k2(2)2=4(1)k^2 - (2)^2 = 4(1) k24=4    k2=8k^2 - 4 = 4 \implies k^2 = 8 Step 5: Secure the final stat. Since xx and yy are both positive real numbers, their sum fraction k=xy+yxk = \frac{x}{y} + \frac{y}{x} must also be strictly positive. k=8=22k = \sqrt{8} = 2\sqrt{2} Final Answer: 222\sqrt{2}
Q20:ipmat indore 2026QASet TheoryMediumMCQ · MCQ
Let S={1,2,,180}S = \{1, 2, \dots, 180\}. Define AA as the set of all multiples of 4 in SS, BB as the set of all multiples of 6 in SS, and CC as the set of all multiples of 9 in SS. The number of elements in SS that belong to exactly one of A,B,CA, B, C is ___
  • A50
  • B40
  • C48
  • D44
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Set Theory Venn diagram boss fight. The meta is to calculate the raw cardinality (headcount) for each individual set by dividing the max range (180180) by the target multiple. Then we find the overlapping intersection stats using the Least Common Multiple (LCM) of the bases. Finally, we drop the specific "exactly one" inclusion-exclusion formula to secure the final count. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Calculate the base set counts. Divide the total range (180180) by each set's respective multiple to get the raw counts: A (multiples of 4)=1804=45|A|\ (\text{multiples of } 4) = \frac{180}{4} = 45 B (multiples of 6)=1806=30|B|\ (\text{multiples of } 6) = \frac{180}{6} = 30 C (multiples of 9)=1809=20|C|\ (\text{multiples of } 9) = \frac{180}{9} = 20 Step 2: Calculate the 2-way intersection stats. To find the overlaps, we calculate the LCM for each pair of bases and divide 180180 by that new LCM: * **AA and BB (LCM of 4 and 6 is 12):** AB (multiples of 12)=18012=15|A \cap B|\ (\text{multiples of } 12) = \frac{180}{12} = 15 * **AA and CC (LCM of 4 and 9 is 36):** AC (multiples of 36)=18036=5|A \cap C|\ (\text{multiples of } 36) = \frac{180}{36} = 5 * **BB and CC (LCM of 6 and 9 is 18):** BC (multiples of 18)=18018=10|B \cap C|\ (\text{multiples of } 18) = \frac{180}{18} = 10 Step 3: Calculate the 3-way intersection stat. Find the overlap of all three sets by taking the LCM of 4, 6, and 9 (which is 36): ABC (multiples of 36)=18036=5|A \cap B \cap C|\ (\text{multiples of } 36) = \frac{180}{36} = 5 Step 4: Execute the 'Exactly One' formula. To find the number of elements that belong to exactly *one* of the sets, we use the standard derived inclusion-exclusion formula for this specific condition: Exactly One=A+B+C2(AB+AC+BC)+3ABCExactly\ One = |A| + |B| + |C| - 2(|A \cap B| + |A \cap C| + |B \cap C|) + 3|A \cap B \cap C| Substitute all our locked stats into the formula: Exactly One=(45+30+20)2(15+5+10)+3(5)Exactly\ One = (45 + 30 + 20) - 2(15 + 5 + 10) + 3(5) Exactly One=952(30)+15Exactly\ One = 95 - 2(30) + 15 Exactly One=9560+15Exactly\ One = 95 - 60 + 15 Exactly One=50Exactly\ One = 50 Final Answer: 50
Q21:ipmat indore 2026QAConic SectionsHardMCQ · MCQ
A circle of non-zero radius has origin as its centre. If it passes through the point of intersection of two curves y2=4axy^2 = 4ax and x2=4ayx^2 = 4ay, then its equation is ___
  • Ax2+y2=16a2x^2 + y^2 = 16a^2
  • Bx2+y2=4a2x^2 + y^2 = 4a^2
  • Cx2+y2=32a2x^2 + y^2 = 32a^2
  • Dx2+y2=a2x^2 + y^2 = a^2
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Coordinate Geometry intersection play. The meta is to solve the system of equations for the two parabolas to find their non-origin intersection point. Since the target circle is centered at the origin and passes through this specific point, we just use the distance formula to calculate the radius squared (r2r^2) and construct the final circle equation. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Find the intersection point of the parabolas. We have two curves: y2=4axy^2 = 4ax and x2=4ayx^2 = 4ay. From the second curve, isolate yy: y=x24ay = \frac{x^2}{4a} Substitute this into the first curve's equation: (x24a)2=4ax\left(\frac{x^2}{4a}\right)^2 = 4ax x416a2=4ax\frac{x^4}{16a^2} = 4ax Multiply both sides by 16a216a^2 to clear the denominator: x4=64a3xx^4 = 64a^3x Step 2: Lock the valid coordinates. Group the terms and factor out xx: x464a3x=0    x(x364a3)=0x^4 - 64a^3x = 0 \implies x(x^3 - 64a^3) = 0 This gives us two possible xx-coordinates for the intersection: x=0x = 0 or x3=64a3    x=4ax^3 = 64a^3 \implies x = 4a. * If x=0x = 0, then y=0y = 0. This is the origin (0,0)(0,0). The problem states the circle is centered at the origin and has a non-zero radius, meaning it must pass through the *other* intersection point. * If x=4ax = 4a, substitute back into our isolated equation to find yy: y=(4a)24a=16a24a=4ay = \frac{(4a)^2}{4a} = \frac{16a^2}{4a} = 4a Our target intersection point is locked at (4a,4a)(4a, 4a). **Step 3: Calculate the circle's radius squared (r2r^2).** The circle is centered at the origin (0,0)(0,0) and passes through (4a,4a)(4a, 4a). We use the standard distance formula to find the squared radius (r2=Δx2+Δy2r^2 = \Delta x^2 + \Delta y^2): r2=(4a0)2+(4a0)2r^2 = (4a - 0)^2 + (4a - 0)^2 r2=16a2+16a2=32a2r^2 = 16a^2 + 16a^2 = 32a^2 Step 4: Construct the final circle equation. The standard equation for a circle centered at the origin is: x2+y2=r2x^2 + y^2 = r^2 Substitute our locked r2r^2 stat into the formula: x2+y2=32a2x^2 + y^2 = 32a^2 Final Answer: x2+y2=32a2x^2 + y^2 = 32a^2
Q22:ipmat indore 2026QACirclesMediumMCQ · MCQ
A person walks one lap along a circle at a speed vv. Thereafter, he runs one lap along the boundary of the largest square that can be inscribed in the circle at a speed 3v3v. The ratio of the time he walks to the time he runs is ___
  • A3π42\frac{3\pi}{4\sqrt{2}}
  • B12π\frac{12}{\pi}
  • C4π32\frac{4\pi}{3\sqrt{2}}
  • D3π22\frac{3\pi}{2\sqrt{2}}
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Geometry and Time, Speed, Distance (TSD) crossover event. The meta is to define a base radius rr for the circle, calculate the walking distance (circumference) and running distance (perimeter of the inscribed square), and then use the given speeds to lock in the time equations. Finally, we divide the two time stats to secure the required ratio. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. **Step 1: Calculate the walking time (TwT_w).** Let the radius of the circle be rr. The walking distance is exactly one lap around the circle (the circumference): Distance (Walk)=2πrDistance\ (Walk) = 2\pi r Since the walking speed is vv, the time taken is: Tw=2πrvT_w = \frac{2\pi r}{v} Step 2: Map the inscribed square and calculate running distance. The largest square inscribed inside a circle will always have its diagonal perfectly matching the circle's diameter (2r2r). Let the side of this square be ss. Using the Pythagorean theorem for the square's diagonal: s2+s2=(2r)2    2s2=4r2    s2=2r2    s=r2s^2 + s^2 = (2r)^2 \implies 2s^2 = 4r^2 \implies s^2 = 2r^2 \implies s = r\sqrt{2} The running distance is one lap along the square's boundary (the perimeter): Distance (Run)=4s=4r2Distance\ (Run) = 4s = 4r\sqrt{2} **Step 3: Calculate the running time (TrT_r).** The person runs along the square at a speed of 3v3v. Tr=Distance (Run)Speed=4r23vT_r = \frac{Distance\ (Run)}{Speed} = \frac{4r\sqrt{2}}{3v} Step 4: Execute the final ratio drop. We need the ratio of the time he walks to the time he runs (TwTr\frac{T_w}{T_r}): Ratio=2πrv4r23vRatio = \frac{\frac{2\pi r}{v}}{\frac{4r\sqrt{2}}{3v}} Multiply by the reciprocal to simplify the fraction: Ratio=2πrv×3v4r2Ratio = \frac{2\pi r}{v} \times \frac{3v}{4r\sqrt{2}} The rr and vv variables instantly cancel out: Ratio=2π×342=6π42Ratio = \frac{2\pi \times 3}{4\sqrt{2}} = \frac{6\pi}{4\sqrt{2}} Simplify the fraction by dividing the top and bottom by 2: Ratio=3π22Ratio = \frac{3\pi}{2\sqrt{2}} Final Answer: 3π22\frac{3\pi}{2\sqrt{2}}
Q23:ipmat indore 2026QARemainderMediumMCQ · MCQ
If mm is a positive integer then the values of kk for which 6m+k6m + k cannot be a perfect square are ___
  • A3 and 4
  • B1 and 5
  • C2 and 5
  • D1, 2 and 5
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a classic Number Theory modulo arithmetic check. Since any number of the form 6m+k6m + k leaves a remainder of kk when divided by 6, we just need to calculate all possible perfect squares modulo 6. Any remainder that doesn't spawn in that valid pool is our target impossible value. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Set the modulo baseline. The expression 6m+k6m + k represents a number that leaves a remainder of kk when divided by 6. In modular arithmetic, this is written as: 6m+kk(mod6)6m + k \equiv k \pmod 6 We need to find the values of kk that can *never* be generated by squaring an integer. **Step 2: Run the perfect square simulations ((mod6)\pmod 6).** We only need to test the base integers from 0 to 5, because in modulo 6, the pattern will just loop infinitely after 5. Let's square them and find their remainders when divided by 6: * 02=00(mod6)0^2 = 0 \equiv 0 \pmod 6 * 12=11(mod6)1^2 = 1 \equiv 1 \pmod 6 * 22=44(mod6)2^2 = 4 \equiv 4 \pmod 6 * 32=9=6(1)+33(mod6)3^2 = 9 = 6(1) + 3 \equiv 3 \pmod 6 * 42=16=6(2)+44(mod6)4^2 = 16 = 6(2) + 4 \equiv 4 \pmod 6 * 52=25=6(4)+11(mod6)5^2 = 25 = 6(4) + 1 \equiv 1 \pmod 6 Step 3: Map the valid pool and isolate the impossible values. From our simulation, the only possible remainders (residues) a perfect square can leave when divided by 6 are the numbers in the set {0,1,3,4}\{0, 1, 3, 4\}. Comparing this valid pool to the base modulo 6 set {0,1,2,3,4,5}\{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}, we can see that the remainders 22 and 55 have a 0%0\% drop rate. Therefore, 6m+k6m + k can *never* be a perfect square if k=2k = 2 or k=5k = 5. Final Answer: 2 and 5
Q24:ipmat indore 2026QAProgression & SeriesMediumMCQ · MCQ
A certain number of people contributed to a charity. The first person contributed one rupee. The rule for contribution was that the next person would contribute double the amount already raised. If the total money raised for the charity was 2187 rupees, then the number of people who contributed to the charity is ___
  • A6
  • B7
  • C8
  • D9
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Progression & Series logic puzzle. The meta here is to track the *running total* instead of individual contributions to avoid getting bogged down in messy summation formulas. Since each new person adds exactly double the existing total, the new total simply triples every single round. We map this exponential scaling, equate it to the final target value, and solve for the exponent to get the exact headcount. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. **Step 1: Map the running total scaling (TnT_n).** Let TnT_n be the total money raised after nn people have dropped their contributions. * Person 1: T1=1T_1 = 1 * **Person nn:** The rule states they contribute double the existing total (2Tn12 \cdot T_{n-1}). Therefore, the new total (TnT_n) is the old total plus the new contribution: Tn=Tn1+2Tn1=3Tn1T_n = T_{n-1} + 2T_{n-1} = 3T_{n-1} This reveals a massive 3×3\times multiplier applied every round. Step 2: Formulate the general equation. Following this 3×3\times geometric scaling pattern from the base stat: * T1=1=30T_1 = 1 = 3^0 * T2=3=31T_2 = 3 = 3^1 * T3=9=32T_3 = 9 = 3^2 The general formula for the total money raised after nn people is: Tn=3n1T_n = 3^{n-1} **Step 3: Solve for the final headcount (nn).** The problem states the final total raised is 21872187 rupees. Set up the equation using our locked formula: 3n1=21873^{n-1} = 2187 Now, we just need to find the power of 3 that hits 21872187. Let's run the exponents: 34=813^4 = 81 35=2433^5 = 243 36=7293^6 = 729 37=21873^7 = 2187 Substitute 373^7 into the equation and equate the exponents to secure the final stat: 3n1=373^{n-1} = 3^7 n1=7    n=8n - 1 = 7 \implies n = 8 Final Answer: 8
Q25:ipmat indore 2026QAMiscellaneousHardMCQ · MCQ
If a,b,a, b, and cc are three prime numbers such that abc=23(a+b+c)abc = 23(a + b + c), then the maximum possible value of a+bca + b - c is ___
  • A28
  • B46
  • C33
  • D25
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Number Theory prime factorization boss fight. The meta is to use the prime nature of 23 to lock in one of the variables instantly. Then, we reduce the equation and use Simon's Favorite Factoring Trick to spawn a list of candidate pairs. Finally, we filter the pairs by the "prime numbers only" constraint and test the surviving triples to min-max the target expression. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Lock the first prime variable. The core equation is abc=23(a+b+c)abc = 23(a + b + c). Since a,b,a, b, and cc are all prime numbers and 23 is also a prime number, the fundamental theorem of arithmetic dictates that one of the variables on the left side absolutely must be 23 to balance the equation. Let's set a=23a = 23. Step 2: Reduce and factor (Simon's Trick). Substitute a=23a = 23 into the equation: 23bc=23(23+b+c)23bc = 23(23 + b + c) Cancel the 23 multiplier from both sides to clean up the battlefield: bc=23+b+cbc = 23 + b + c Move all variables to the left side: bcbc=23bc - b - c = 23 Now, apply Simon's Favorite Factoring Trick by adding 1 to both sides to perfectly complete the algebraic rectangle: bcbc+1=24bc - b - c + 1 = 24 (b1)(c1)=24(b - 1)(c - 1) = 24 Step 3: Filter the factor pairs. We need to test the integer factor pairs of 24 to see which ones yield prime numbers for both bb and cc. * Pair (1, 24): (b1)=1    b=2(b-1)=1 \implies b=2 and (c1)=24    c=25(c-1)=24 \implies c=25. (25 is not prime. Invalid drop.) * Pair (2, 12): (b1)=2    b=3(b-1)=2 \implies b=3 and (c1)=12    c=13(c-1)=12 \implies c=13. (Both 3 and 13 are prime. **Valid Triple: {23,3,13}\{23, 3, 13\}**) * Pair (3, 8): (b1)=3    b=4(b-1)=3 \implies b=4 and (c1)=8    c=9(c-1)=8 \implies c=9. (Neither are prime. Invalid drop.) * Pair (4, 6): (b1)=4    b=5(b-1)=4 \implies b=5 and (c1)=6    c=7(c-1)=6 \implies c=7. (Both 5 and 7 are prime. **Valid Triple: {23,5,7}\{23, 5, 7\}**) *(Note: Swapping the values for bb and cc is perfectly valid since they are interchangeable in the base equation, so we just group them as sets).* Step 4: Min-Max the target expression. We need to find the *maximum* possible value for the expression a+bca + b - c. To maximize this, we must assign the *smallest* possible prime from our valid triples to the subtracted variable cc. * **Timeline 1 (Triple {23,3,13}\{23, 3, 13\}):** Assign a=23a = 23, b=13b = 13, and c=3c = 3. Maximum=23+133=33Maximum = 23 + 13 - 3 = 33 * **Timeline 2 (Triple {23,5,7}\{23, 5, 7\}):** Assign a=23a = 23, b=7b = 7, and c=5c = 5. Maximum=23+75=25Maximum = 23 + 7 - 5 = 25 Comparing the timelines, the absolute maximum possible value is 33. Final Answer: 33
Q26:ipmat indore 2026LRDITabular DataEasyMCQ · MCQ
A nutritionist is designing a daily diet plan of a person using five food items: Milk, Spinach, Almonds, Oats, and Rice. The Minimum Daily Requirement (MDR) of the nutrients Calcium, Iron and Protein should be 1100 mg, 15 mg, and 40 g, respectively. The following table gives nutrient content per serving of each food item:
Food itemCalcium (mg)Iron (mg)Protein (g)
Milk30008
Spinach9063
Almonds21046
Oats12035
Rice5014
If two servings of Milk are part of the daily diet plan, then the minimum number of servings of any other single item that can satisfy the MDR of all three nutrients is ___
  • A6
  • B5
  • C4
  • D7
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Data Interpretation stat-check. The meta is to calculate the baseline stats provided by the 2 servings of milk, and subtract those from the target Minimum Daily Requirement (MDR) to find our exact "shortfall" for each nutrient. Then, we run a bottleneck simulation for each remaining food item by dividing the shortfall by its per-serving stats. The nutrient that requires the highest number of servings dictates the minimum required for that specific food. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Calculate the Milk baseline and find the shortfall. The target MDR is: Calcium = 1100 mg, Iron = 15 mg, Protein = 40 g. Two servings of Milk provide: * Calcium=2×300=600 mgCalcium = 2 \times 300 = 600\text{ mg} * Iron=2×0=0 mgIron = 2 \times 0 = 0\text{ mg} * Protein=2×8=16 gProtein = 2 \times 8 = 16\text{ g} Subtract this baseline from the MDR to find the remaining shortfall to be met: * Calcium Shortfall=1100600=500 mgCalcium\ Shortfall = 1100 - 600 = 500\text{ mg} * Iron Shortfall=150=15 mgIron\ Shortfall = 15 - 0 = 15\text{ mg} * Protein Shortfall=4016=24 gProtein\ Shortfall = 40 - 16 = 24\text{ g} Step 2: Run the bottleneck simulation for the candidates. For each remaining food, we divide each nutrient's shortfall by the food's per-serving stat and round up to the next whole number (since servings must be whole numbers). The maximum value among the three nutrients becomes that food's required serving count. * Spinach: * Ca: 500905.56    6 servings\frac{500}{90} \approx 5.56 \implies 6\text{ servings} * Fe: 156=2.5    3 servings\frac{15}{6} = 2.5 \implies 3\text{ servings} * Pr: 243=8    8 servings\frac{24}{3} = 8 \implies 8\text{ servings} * *Bottleneck:* Protein requires 8 servings. * Almonds: * Ca: 5002102.38    3 servings\frac{500}{210} \approx 2.38 \implies 3\text{ servings} * Fe: 154=3.75    4 servings\frac{15}{4} = 3.75 \implies 4\text{ servings} * Pr: 246=4    4 servings\frac{24}{6} = 4 \implies 4\text{ servings} * *Bottleneck:* Iron and Protein require 4 servings. * Oats: * Ca: 5001204.17    5 servings\frac{500}{120} \approx 4.17 \implies 5\text{ servings} * Fe: 153=5    5 servings\frac{15}{3} = 5 \implies 5\text{ servings} * Pr: 245=4.8    5 servings\frac{24}{5} = 4.8 \implies 5\text{ servings} * *Bottleneck:* All nutrients perfectly cap at 5 servings. * Rice: * Fe: 151=15    15 servings\frac{15}{1} = 15 \implies 15\text{ servings} * *Bottleneck:* Iron requires a massive 15 servings, so we don't even need to calculate the rest. Step 3: Secure the final stat. Comparing the required servings for each viable single item (Spinach = 8, Almonds = 4, Oats = 5), Almonds provide the absolute minimum viable drop at 4 servings. Final Answer: 4
Q27:ipmat indore 2026LRDITabular DataEasyMCQ · MCQ
A nutritionist is designing a daily diet plan of a person using five food items: Milk, Spinach, Almonds, Oats, and Rice. The Minimum Daily Requirement (MDR) of the nutrients Calcium, Iron and Protein should be 1100 mg, 15 mg, and 40 g, respectively. The following table gives nutrient content per serving of each food item:
Food itemCalcium (mg)Iron (mg)Protein (g)
Milk30008
Spinach9063
Almonds21046
Oats12035
Rice5014
The food item(s) that can satisfy at least half of the MDR for all the three nutrients using up to seven servings of that single item alone is ___
  • AOnly Almonds, and Spinach
  • BOnly Almonds, and Oats
  • COnly Almonds, Spinach, and Oats
  • DOnly Almonds
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Data Interpretation threshold check. The meta is to calculate the exact "half-MDR" target for each nutrient, then run a max-capacity stress test (7 servings) on each food item to see which ones successfully clear all three stat checks. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Calculate the Half-MDR thresholds. Divide the standard Minimum Daily Requirement by 2 to lock in our new target baseline: * Calcium=11002=550 mgCalcium = \frac{1100}{2} = 550\text{ mg} * Iron=152=7.5 mgIron = \frac{15}{2} = 7.5\text{ mg} * Protein=402=20 gProtein = \frac{40}{2} = 20\text{ g} Step 2: Run the 7-serving stress test. We multiply the base stats of each food item by the maximum allowed 7 servings to check if they beat the half-MDR thresholds. * Milk: * Iron provides 0 mg0\text{ mg} per serving. 7×0=0 mg7 \times 0 = 0\text{ mg}. * *Result:* Instantly fails the 7.5 mg7.5\text{ mg} Iron check. Reject. * Spinach: * Ca=7×90=630 mgCa = 7 \times 90 = 630\text{ mg} (Clears 550) * Fe=7×6=42 mgFe = 7 \times 6 = 42\text{ mg} (Clears 7.5) * Pr=7×3=21 gPr = 7 \times 3 = 21\text{ g} (Clears 20) * *Result:* All three clear. Qualifies. * Almonds: * Ca=7×210=1470 mgCa = 7 \times 210 = 1470\text{ mg} (Clears 550) * Fe=7×4=28 mgFe = 7 \times 4 = 28\text{ mg} (Clears 7.5) * Pr=7×6=42 gPr = 7 \times 6 = 42\text{ g} (Clears 20) * *Result:* All three clear. Qualifies. * Oats: * Ca=7×120=840 mgCa = 7 \times 120 = 840\text{ mg} (Clears 550) * Fe=7×3=21 mgFe = 7 \times 3 = 21\text{ mg} (Clears 7.5) * Pr=7×5=35 gPr = 7 \times 5 = 35\text{ g} (Clears 20) * *Result:* All three clear. Qualifies. * Rice: * Ca=7×50=350 mgCa = 7 \times 50 = 350\text{ mg} * *Result:* Fails the 550 mg550\text{ mg} Calcium check. Reject. Step 3: Tally the qualifying items. Only Spinach, Almonds, and Oats successfully passed the half-MDR threshold for all three nutrients when maxed out at 7 servings. Final Answer: Only Almonds, Spinach, and Oats
Q28:ipmat indore 2026LRDITabular DataEasyMCQ · MCQ
A nutritionist is designing a daily diet plan of a person using five food items: Milk, Spinach, Almonds, Oats, and Rice. The Minimum Daily Requirement (MDR) of the nutrients Calcium, Iron and Protein should be 1100 mg, 15 mg, and 40 g, respectively. The following table gives nutrient content per serving of each food item:
Food itemCalcium (mg)Iron (mg)Protein (g)
Milk30008
Spinach9063
Almonds21046
Oats12035
Rice5014
If only xx servings of Milk and yy servings of Rice are included in the diet plan, then the minimum value of x+yx + y that will satisfy the MDR of all three nutrients is ___
  • A17
  • B15
  • C24
  • D22
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Data Interpretation linear optimization problem. The meta is to set up inequalities for the Minimum Daily Requirement (MDR) of each nutrient using the variables xx (Milk) and yy (Rice). Since Milk has a zero stat for Iron, Rice becomes our sole bottleneck for that nutrient, instantly locking in a high baseline for yy. From there, we test the closest integer boundaries to find the absolute minimum combined servings (x+yx + y). Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Construct the constraint equations. We need to satisfy the MDR for Calcium (1100 mg1100\text{ mg}), Iron (15 mg15\text{ mg}), and Protein (40 g40\text{ g}) using xx servings of Milk and yy servings of Rice. Let's pull the stats from the table: * Calcium Constraint: 300x+50y1100300x + 50y \geq 1100 * Iron Constraint: 0x+1y15    y150x + 1y \geq 15 \implies y \geq 15 * Protein Constraint: 8x+4y408x + 4y \geq 40 Step 2: Isolate the Iron bottleneck. Because Milk provides literally zero Iron, Rice must carry the entire 15 mg15\text{ mg} requirement alone. This locks our yy variable at a strict minimum: y15y \geq 15. *(Note: With y15y \geq 15, the Protein constraint 8x+4(15)40    8x+60408x + 4(15) \geq 40 \implies 8x + 60 \geq 40 is automatically satisfied for any non-negative xx, so we can completely drop it from our calculations.)* Step 3: Min-max the remaining Calcium constraint. We test the lowest possible integer values for yy starting from our baseline (1515) to minimize the sum of x+yx + y. * **Timeline 1: Let y=15y = 15** Substitute into the Calcium constraint: 300x+50(15)1100300x + 50(15) \geq 1100 300x+7501100    300x350    x3503001.17300x + 750 \geq 1100 \implies 300x \geq 350 \implies x \geq \frac{350}{300} \approx 1.17 Since servings must be whole numbers, we round up to x=2x = 2. Total servings: x+y=2+15=17x + y = 2 + 15 = 17. * **Timeline 2: Let y=16y = 16** Substitute into the Calcium constraint: 300x+50(16)1100300x + 50(16) \geq 1100 300x+8001100    300x300    x1300x + 800 \geq 1100 \implies 300x \geq 300 \implies x \geq 1 Since servings must be whole numbers, x=1x = 1. Total servings: x+y=1+16=17x + y = 1 + 16 = 17. * **Timeline 3: Push for x=0x = 0** For xx to be exactly 0, Rice must satisfy Calcium completely: 50y1100    y2250y \geq 1100 \implies y \geq 22 Total servings: x+y=0+22=22x + y = 0 + 22 = 22. (This is a much higher combined cost, invalidating the strat). Step 4: Secure the final stat. Both of our optimal lower-bound timelines (y=15y = 15 and y=16y = 16) plateau at an absolute minimum combined total of 17 servings. Final Answer: 17
Q29:ipmat indore 2026LRDITabular DataEasyMCQ · MCQ
A nutritionist is designing a daily diet plan of a person using five food items: Milk, Spinach, Almonds, Oats, and Rice. The Minimum Daily Requirement (MDR) of the nutrients Calcium, Iron and Protein should be 1100 mg, 15 mg, and 40 g, respectively. The following table gives nutrient content per serving of each food item:
Food itemCalcium (mg)Iron (mg)Protein (g)
Milk30008
Spinach9063
Almonds21046
Oats12035
Rice5014
When one serving of each of the five items is included in the diet plan, the nutrient with the least percentage of MDR satisfied is ___
  • AProtein with 65% MDR
  • BCalcium with 65% MDR
  • CCalcium with 70% MDR
  • DProtein with 70% MDR
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a basic Data Interpretation aggregation check. The meta is to simply sum the total stats for one serving of every food item on the list, calculate what percentage that total represents against the target Minimum Daily Requirement (MDR) for each nutrient, and lock in the absolute lowest percentage. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Calculate the total nutrient yield. We are taking exactly one serving of all five items. Sum the columns from the table to find the total baseline stats: Total Calcium=300+90+210+120+50=770 mgTotal\ Calcium = 300 + 90 + 210 + 120 + 50 = 770\text{ mg} Total Iron=0+6+4+3+1=14 mgTotal\ Iron = 0 + 6 + 4 + 3 + 1 = 14\text{ mg} Total Protein=8+3+6+5+4=26 gTotal\ Protein = 8 + 3 + 6 + 5 + 4 = 26\text{ g} Step 2: Calculate the percentage of MDR satisfied. The target MDRs are: Calcium (1100 mg1100\text{ mg}), Iron (15 mg15\text{ mg}), and Protein (40 g40\text{ g}). Divide our total yield by these targets and multiply by 100 to get the percentage: * Calcium: 7701100×100=70%\frac{770}{1100} \times 100 = 70\% * Iron: 1415×10093.3%\frac{14}{15} \times 100 \approx 93.3\% * Protein: 2640×100=65%\frac{26}{40} \times 100 = 65\% Step 3: Isolate the minimum stat. Comparing our final percentages (70%, 93.3%, and 65%), Protein clearly has the lowest satisfaction rate at exactly 65%. Final Answer: Protein with 65% MDR
Q30:ipmat indore 2026LRDITabular DataEasyMCQ · MCQ
A nutritionist is designing a daily diet plan of a person using five food items: Milk, Spinach, Almonds, Oats, and Rice. The Minimum Daily Requirement (MDR) of the nutrients Calcium, Iron and Protein should be 1100 mg, 15 mg, and 40 g, respectively. The following table gives nutrient content per serving of each food item:
Food itemCalcium (mg)Iron (mg)Protein (g)
Milk30008
Spinach9063
Almonds21046
Oats12035
Rice5014
The number of food items that can satisfy at least 15% of the MDR for at least two nutrients in one serving is ___
  • A1
  • B3
  • C2
  • D0
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Data Interpretation threshold scan. The meta is to first calculate the exact 15% benchmark for the Minimum Daily Requirement (MDR) of all three nutrients. Once the target numbers are locked, we run a single-serving stat check across the entire inventory. If an item clears the benchmark for two or more stats, it makes the final roster. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Calculate the 15% MDR benchmarks. Multiply the target MDRs by 0.15 to lock in our new minimum thresholds: * Calcium=1100×0.15=165 mgCalcium = 1100 \times 0.15 = 165\text{ mg} * Iron=15×0.15=2.25 mgIron = 15 \times 0.15 = 2.25\text{ mg} * Protein=40×0.15=6 gProtein = 40 \times 0.15 = 6\text{ g} Step 2: Run the inventory threshold scan. We test one serving of each food item against our locked benchmarks (Ca 165\geq 165, Fe 2.25\geq 2.25, Pr 6\geq 6). We need at least *two* "Pass" results for the item to qualify. * Milk (Ca: 300, Fe: 0, Pr: 8) * Ca: 300165300 \geq 165 (Pass) * Fe: 0<2.250 < 2.25 (Fail) * Pr: 868 \geq 6 (Pass) * *Result:* 2 thresholds met. Qualifies. * Spinach (Ca: 90, Fe: 6, Pr: 3) * Ca: 90<16590 < 165 (Fail) * Fe: 62.256 \geq 2.25 (Pass) * Pr: 3<63 < 6 (Fail) * *Result:* 1 threshold met. Reject. * Almonds (Ca: 210, Fe: 4, Pr: 6) * Ca: 210165210 \geq 165 (Pass) * Fe: 42.254 \geq 2.25 (Pass) * Pr: 666 \geq 6 (Pass) * *Result:* 3 thresholds met. Qualifies. * Oats (Ca: 120, Fe: 3, Pr: 5) * Ca: 120<165120 < 165 (Fail) * Fe: 32.253 \geq 2.25 (Pass) * Pr: 5<65 < 6 (Fail) * *Result:* 1 threshold met. Reject. * Rice (Ca: 50, Fe: 1, Pr: 4) * Ca: 50<16550 < 165 (Fail) * Fe: 1<2.251 < 2.25 (Fail) * Pr: 4<64 < 6 (Fail) * *Result:* 0 thresholds met. Reject. Step 3: Tally the final roster. Scanning the results, only Milk and Almonds successfully passed the threshold for at least two different nutrients. Final Answer: 2

Other IPMAT Indore papers & sections