The Widening That Does Not Work: Induced Demand and Road Capacity

PRACTICE
100:00+4 −1MCQ Single Answer
Reading Passage
Congestion looks like a shortage of space. A road carries more vehicles than it was built for, traffic slows, and the obvious remedy is to build more road. For most of the twentieth century transport agencies acted on exactly this reasoning, and the widening of congested highways absorbed a large share of public infrastructure spending in many countries. However, studies comparing metropolitan areas over long periods have found that the remedy does not work as intended. Across the areas examined, the total distance driven rose almost in exact proportion to the lane miles added — a relationship now widely known as the fundamental law of road congestion. Three separate effects combine to produce it. Some drivers make trips they would not have made when the road was slower. Others shift onto the widened road from alternative routes, or move their journeys back into the peak hours they had learned to avoid. And over a longer horizon, housing and commercial development follows the new capacity, generating traffic that did not previously exist anywhere. Within a few years of a widening being completed, travel times on the corridor typically return to close to what they were before. None of this establishes that road building is always pointless. A road that creates a genuinely new connection is a different proposition from the widening of a corridor that is already saturated, and the gains to freight movement from more reliable highways are real and measurable. What the evidence does establish is that congestion relief is the wrong justification to offer. Where road space is the binding constraint, only pricing can do what capacity cannot: charging for use at busy times rations the space by willingness to pay, rather than allowing it to be rationed, as it is now, by delay.
Which of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?
Answers unlock once you submit